Wing · The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 2026 · cross-sectional matched case-control study · n=58

The Tuned Cortex: Convergent Expertise-Related Structural and Functional Remodeling across the Adult Lifespan.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Case-control cross-sectional observational neuroimaging study

PubMed 41730682 · doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1307-25.2026 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

A cross-sectional study evaluated 29 bird identification experts (aged 24–75 years, 15 female) and 29 matched novices (aged 22–79 years, 14 female). Cortical microstructure was assessed via diffusion-weighted MRI to measure mean diffusivity (MD). Participants performed a delayed matching task identifying local and nonlocal bird species during functional MRI to evaluate behavioral accuracy and task-related BOLD timecourses.

What was found

Compared to novices, experts showed lower MD in frontoparietal areas (superior frontal gyrus, intraparietal sulcus) and posterior cortical regions (angular gyrus, precuneus, lateral occipital cortex, fusiform gyrus), accompanied by a trend for attenuated age-related increases in MD. Lower MD in these regions predicted higher identification accuracy among experts. The same frontoparietal regions displayed greater BOLD activation during judgments of nonlocal compared to local species in experts, and this differential activation magnitude tracked identification performance. The abstract does not provide exact effect sizes, test statistics, or p-values.

Why it matters

The findings illustrate convergent microstructural remodeling and functional recruitment in cortical networks underlying real-world perceptual expertise across adulthood.

Limits

The study is cross-sectional and cannot establish whether cortical differences are directly caused by practice or reflect pre-existing traits. The sample size is modest (29 per group), and no exact numerical metrics, confidence intervals, or statistical values are reported in the abstract. Longitudinal decline was inferred from cross-sectional age trends rather than prospective follow-up.

Cited by