Most people do not consume sufficient amounts of prebiotics, vitamins, and minerals through whole foods alone.
"And of course, we should all eat high-quality whole foods, but most of us are probably not getting enough prebiotics, vitamins, and minerals, and AG1 ensures that those gaps are filled." (said at 0:41:10)
Nationally representative dietary surveys (such as NHANES in the United States) show that substantial proportions of the population fail to meet the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) from food alone for several specific 'shortfall' nutrients—notably vitamin D, vitamin E, calcium, magnesium, potassium, and dietary fiber (which includes prebiotic fibers). However, the claim is overly broad when framed as a universal deficit across prebiotics, vitamins, and minerals generally, because most people do consume adequate amounts of many other micronutrients (such as most B vitamins, phosphorus, selenium, and iron in men) through whole foods and fortified foods alone.
- context: Impact of Frequency of Multi-Vitamin/Multi-Mineral Supplement Intake on Nutritional Adequa… (Nutrients 2017)
"Based on nationally representative data in 10,698 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 2009 to 2012, assessments were made of intakes from food alone versus food plus multi-vitamin/multi-mineral supplements (MVMS) of 17 nutrients with an Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) and a Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL)" (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - context: Contribution of Dietary Supplements to Nutritional Adequacy in Various Adult Age Groups. (Nutrients 2017)
"The Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2015-2020 specifically identified vitamins A, C, D and E, calcium, magnesium, iron, potassium, choline and fiber as "underconsumed nutrients". Based on nationally representative data in 10,698 adults from National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES), 2009-2012, assessments were made of age-group differences in the impact of dietary supplements on nutrient intake and inadequacies." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
Nattokinase supplementation can help reduce LDL cholesterol.
"As a result, I decided to start supplementing with nattokinase, which can naturally help reduce LDL cholesterol." (said at 1:08:00)
Clinical evidence indicates that nattokinase supplementation can reduce LDL cholesterol and improve lipid profiles, but the effect appears strongly dose-dependent. Studies testing higher daily doses (6,000 to 10,800 FU/day) have shown statistically significant reductions in LDL cholesterol, whereas lower or standard commercial doses (e.g., 2,000 to 3,600 FU/day) have demonstrated minimal to no lipid-lowering efficacy when used as monotherapy. Marked LDL reductions are also frequently observed when nattokinase is combined with red yeast rice (Monascus).
- contradicts: Combined nattokinase with red yeast rice but not nattokinase alone has potent effects on b… (Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition 2009)
"After controlling for baseline levels, only the combined group, but not mono group, showed a significant difference (p<0.0001) in TC, LDL-C and TC/HDL-C ratio when compared with the placebo group." (abstract, results)
pubmed - supports: [A clinical study on the effect of nattokinase on carotid artery atherosclerosis and hyper… (Zhonghua yi xue za zhi 2017)
"Both treatments reduced total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglyceride (TG). While the reduction in both groups was shown to be statistically significant ( P <0.01), the reduction of TC, LDL-C and TG in ST group was significantly greater ( P <0.05)." (abstract, results)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Effective management of atherosclerosis progress and hyperlipidemia with nattokinase: A cl… (Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine 2022)
"We found that NK at a dose of 10,800 FU/day effectively managed the progression of atherosclerosis and hyperlipidemia with a significant improvement in the lipid profile... NK was found to be ineffective in lowering lipids and suppressing atherosclerosis progression at a dose of 3,600 FU/day." (abstract, results)
pubmedfull study (doi)
The Environmental Working Group showed that over 122 million Americans drink tap water with high levels of chemicals known to cause cancer.
"The Environmental Working Group has also shown that over 122 million Americans drink tap water with high levels of chemicals known to cause cancer." (said at 1:34:30)
Research by Environmental Working Group (EWG) scientists (including assessments of U.S. community water systems) evaluated cumulative theoretical lifetime cancer risks from tap water contaminants such as disinfection byproducts, arsenic, and nitrate. However, these models assess cumulative lifetime excess cancer risk benchmarks (e.g., risks above one in one million or one in ten thousand, or non-enforceable health guideline goals) rather than water containing illegal or acutely high contaminant levels exceeding federal Safe Drinking Water Act standards.