Karanja · Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1999 · randomized controlled feeding trial · n=?

Descriptive characteristics of the dietary patterns used in the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Trial. DASH Collaborative Research Group.

Cited 277 times in the scientific literature.

Level 2 - randomized trial

Descriptive nutrient analysis from a randomized controlled feeding trial

PubMed 10450290 · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(99)00412-5 · record verified 2026-08-31

What was done

In the multicenter Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) trial, participants completed a 3-week run-in period on a control diet before being randomized for 8 weeks to one of three controlled feeding patterns: a control diet, a fruits and vegetables diet, or a combination diet. Sodium intake and body weight were kept constant across all interventions. Analysis of variance models were used to compare the food-group structure, nutrient profiles, and participant nutrient consumption across the three diets.

What was found

The abstract reports qualitative comparisons between diets without providing specific numerical values. The control and fruits and vegetables diets were higher in oils, table fats, salad dressings, red meats, saturated fat, total fat, and cholesterol compared to the combination diet. The fruits and vegetables diet and the combination diet were higher in fruits, juices, vegetables, nuts, seeds, magnesium, potassium, and fiber, and lower in sweets and sugary drinks compared to control. The combination diet uniquely increased calcium via low-fat dairy foods and offered greater fruit variety, with substantial differences across diets in vitamins A, C, E, folate, B-6, and zinc.

Why it matters

This paper documents the specific food-group and nutrient composition underlying the original DASH trial diets. It illustrates how whole-food selections were structured to achieve target nutrient levels while keeping sodium and body weight constant.

Limits

The abstract does not report participant sample size, demographic characteristics, exact nutrient quantities, or clinical blood pressure outcomes. The results reflect tightly controlled feeding conditions that may not directly translate to self-selected, free-living dietary adherence.

Cited by