Ondze · Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 2003 · Case-control study · n=36

Sleep architecture, slow wave activity and sleep spindles in mild sleep disordered breathing.

Cited 71 times in the scientific literature.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Case-control comparative study

PubMed 12738432 · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00389-9 · record verified 2026-08-29

What was done

Eighteen patients with mild sleep-disordered breathing (RDI 5–30/h; 6 females, 12 males; aged 18–56 years) were compared to 18 controls (11 females, 7 males; aged 18–52 years). Sleep EEG power density was assessed using fast Fourier transform analysis, and sleep spindle density was measured using integrated digital filtering analysis, alongside esophageal pressure monitoring on the third night.

What was found

The abstract reports directional statistical comparisons without numerical values or effect sizes. Mild SDB patients had significantly higher numbers of awakenings lasting <1 minute and higher arousal indices during total sleep time, NREM sleep, and slow-wave sleep compared to controls. Theta and sigma frequency bands were significantly lower in patients across all sleep cycles and the whole night. While slow-wave activity decreased across sleep cycles in both groups, the exponential decay time constant was significantly slower in patients. Additionally, the sleep spindle index was significantly lower in both stage 2 and slow-wave sleep in patients compared to controls.

Why it matters

This study demonstrates that even mild sleep-disordered breathing alters sleep microstructure, delaying slow-wave activity dissipation and decreasing sleep spindle production.

Limits

The study is limited by a small sample size (18 per group), baseline sex imbalance between cohorts (6 females in patient group vs. 11 in control group), and the absence of exact quantitative values or confidence intervals in the abstract.

Cited by