Lader · Psychopharmacology 1992 · narrative review · n=?

Rebound insomnia and newer hypnotics.

Cited 74 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review of literature without systematic review methodology

PubMed 1523276 · doi:10.1007/BF02245108 · record verified 2026-08-31

What was done

The author reviewed evidence on rebound insomnia following hypnotic discontinuation, specifically evaluating newer selective benzodiazepine receptor agonists (quazepam, zolpidem) and atypical agents (zopiclone) against older benzodiazepines, and discussed methodological needs such as sleep-laboratory and night-by-night clinical analyses.

What was found

The abstract reports no quantitative data or specific numerical values. It qualitatively notes that available evidence, while limited, is consistent with claims of lower rebound potential for newer agents compared with older benzodiazepine hypnotics of equivalent duration of action.

Why it matters

It contextualizes early evidence regarding whether newer, subtype-selective hypnotic agents reduce the risk of post-discontinuation sleep worsening seen with conventional benzodiazepines.

Limits

The abstract reports no sample sizes, effect sizes, or study counts. Findings are drawn from a non-systematic narrative review of limited early evidence, and the author explicitly notes that further rigorous studies are required before conclusions can be fully accepted.

Cited by