Caro · The Quarterly review of biology 1992 · narrative review and conceptual analysis · n=?

Is there teaching in nonhuman animals?

Cited 604 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review and conceptual framework paper (graded by design analogy, not clinical CEBM).

PubMed 1635977 · doi:10.1086/417553 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

The authors derived a functional operational definition of teaching to distinguish it from passive social learning, assessing theoretical requirements such as mental state attribution. They then reviewed documented cases of social interaction in several orders of mammals and birds that had been interpreted as evidence of teaching.

What was found

No quantitative data or sample numbers were reported in the abstract. Observed cases were categorized into two forms: "opportunity teaching" (providing offspring with opportunities to practice skills) and "coaching" (encouraging or punishing the behavior of young). The authors noted that apparent taxonomic differences in the use of these forms may reflect dataset quality rather than species-specific constraints.

Why it matters

The paper provides a functional framework for identifying teaching in nonhuman animals without requiring human-centric cognitive prerequisites like theory of mind.

Limits

This is a narrative review and theoretical framework without systematic search criteria or quantitative synthesis. As noted in the abstract, the existing literature base is poorly documented and limited by historical reliance on narrow definitions.

Cited by