Brooks · Sleep 2006 · repeated-measures crossover trial · n=24

A brief afternoon nap following nocturnal sleep restriction: which nap duration is most recuperative?

Cited 275 times in the scientific literature.

Level 2 - randomized trial

Repeated-measures crossover experimental study in healthy human participants

PubMed 16796222 · doi:10.1093/sleep/29.6.831 · record verified 2026-08-29

What was done

A repeated-measures crossover study evaluated five conditions following nocturnal sleep restriction to approximately 5 hours: a no-nap control and naps of precisely 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes of sleep taken at 3:00 PM. Participants were 24 healthy young adults who were good sleepers and non-regular nappers. Post-nap testing evaluated sleep latency, subjective sleepiness, fatigue, vigor, cognitive performance, and electroencephalographic elements over 3 hours in a controlled laboratory setting.

What was found

The abstract reports directional and temporal comparisons without numerical values or effect sizes: - 5-minute nap: Produced few benefits compared to the no-nap control. - 10-minute nap: Produced immediate improvements across all measures (sleep latency, subjective sleepiness, fatigue, vigor, and cognitive performance), with some benefits lasting up to 155 minutes. - 20-minute nap: Improvements emerged 35 minutes post-nap and lasted up to 125 minutes. - 30-minute nap: Produced immediate post-nap impairment in alertness and performance (sleep inertia), followed by improvements lasting up to 155 minutes.

Why it matters

A 10-minute nap provides optimal restorative benefits following sleep restriction, delivering immediate cognitive and alertness gains without the temporary post-awakening grogginess associated with longer naps.

Limits

The study was small (n = 24) and limited to healthy young adults who were non-habitual nappers, limiting generalizability to chronic sleep deprivation, shift workers, or older populations. Testing was confined to 3 hours post-nap in a laboratory setting, and the abstract does not report specific numerical data or confidence intervals.

Cited by