Mauri · Functional neurology 2006 · matched cohort study with longitudinal follow-up · n=400

Interaction between Apolipoprotein epsilon 4 and traumatic brain injury in patients with Alzheimer's disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Cited 37 times in the scientific literature.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Non-randomized matched cohort study with longitudinal follow-up

PubMed 17367583 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

The authors evaluated 337 consecutive patients with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 63 subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) across northern and southern Italy. History of traumatic brain injury (TBI) with loss of consciousness was identified via informant interviews and medical record review. Patients with a history of TBI were compared to matched controls (matched for age, sex, education, and degree of mental impairment) cross-sectionally and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups for cognitive progression, behavioral disturbances (using the Global Deterioration Scale and Neuropsychiatric Inventory), and ApoE epsilon 4 allele frequency.

What was found

History of TBI with loss of consciousness was identified in 21 AD patients and 9 MCI patients. Compared to matched controls, patients with TBI history showed significantly more marked depressive and behavioral disturbances on the Global Deterioration Scale and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (p < 0.05). ApoE epsilon 4 allele frequency was 40.5% in the AD subgroup and 11% in the MCI subgroup with TBI, compared to 4% in the control group. Follow-up at 6 and 12 months showed no significant differences in the rate of progression of cognitive changes.

Why it matters

This study supports the hypothesis of a synergistic interaction between head trauma and ApoE epsilon 4 in dementia susceptibility and links prior TBI to increased neuropsychiatric burden, while finding no evidence that these factors accelerate short-term cognitive decline once impairment is present.

Limits

The subset of patients with TBI and loss of consciousness was very small (n = 30 total: 21 AD, 9 MCI), limiting statistical power. Exposure assessment relied on retrospective medical record review and informant recall, introducing risk of recall bias. Longitudinal follow-up was limited to 12 months, and exact numerical scores or confidence intervals were not reported in the abstract.

Cited by