Bagoly · Orvosi hetilap 2007 · narrative review · n=?

[The role of vinpocetine in the treatment of cerebrovascular diseases based in human studies].

Cited 40 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review summarizing published human clinical studies and neuroimaging findings without reported systematic review methodology

PubMed 17631470 · doi:10.1556/OH.2007.28115 · record verified 2026-08-29

What was done

This review summarized clinical and neuroimaging evidence evaluating the effects and indications of vinpocetine in patients with acute and chronic cerebrovascular diseases. The authors synthesized findings from positron emission tomography (PET), transcranial Doppler (TCD), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), hemorheological assessments, and international clinical trial meta-analyses.

What was found

The abstract reports no numerical values, effect sizes, or statistical confidence intervals. The authors reported that evidence is lacking for vinpocetine in acute ischemic stroke, with only a few small studies showing slight improvement. For chronic cerebrovascular disease, cited literature indicated increased cerebral perfusion, elevated oxygen and glucose consumption, improved rheologic parameters, and significant improvements in cognitive achievement and quality of life.

Why it matters

This review summarizes the clinical landscape for vinpocetine, indicating potential metabolic, hemodynamic, and cognitive utility in chronic cerebral hypoperfusion while noting that data remain insufficient to support its use in acute stroke.

Limits

The abstract provides no sample sizes, specific trial designs, search strategy details, or quantitative data. Adverse events and safety outcomes were not described.

Cited by