Raina · International journal of impotence research 2008 · narrative review · n=?

Early penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy: Cleveland clinic experience.

Cited 43 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review without systematic methodology or new clinical data

PubMed 17687391 · doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3901573 · record verified 2026-08-27

What was done

The authors reviewed the pathophysiology of cavernosal hypoxia and structural fibrosis after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, examining available evidence for interventions such as intracavernosal injections to support nerve recovery and penile rehabilitation.

What was found

The review cites historical post-prostatectomy potency rates of 40% to 86% with recovery times of 6 to 24 months. Although initial studies of intracavernosal injections appeared beneficial, no numerical results, effect sizes, or comparative statistics are reported in the abstract.

Why it matters

It outlines the mechanistic rationale for initiating proactive penile rehabilitation early after prostate surgery to prevent irreversible corporal fibrosis and venous leakage.

Limits

This is a narrative review with no systematic search criteria. The abstract reports no new patient data, sample sizes, or quantitative outcome measures.

Cited by