Halon · International journal of cardiology 2008 · observational comparative study · n=89

Coronary stent assessment on multidetector computed tomography: source and predictors of image distortion.

Cited 12 times in the scientific literature.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Observational comparative diagnostic imaging study comparing MDCT measurements against quantitative coronary angiography.

PubMed 17707094 · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.04.097 · record verified 2026-08-27

What was done

Researchers evaluated 151 non-opacified coronary stents in 89 patients (81% men, mean age 65±10 years) imaged with a 40-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scanner. Stent dimensions and image distortion on MDCT were compared across different stent types, sizes, and orientations against quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) measurements obtained immediately post-implantation and manufacturer data.

What was found

Stent image quality on MDCT was good for 107 stents (71%), moderate for 38 (25%), and poor for 6 (4%), with 2 (<1%) unassessable. Blooming artifact led to a mean MDCT luminal inner diameter 30±14% smaller than QCA (2.0±0.5 mm vs 2.9±0.3 mm, p<0.001) and a mean outer diameter 31±14% larger than QCA (3.8±0.5 mm vs 2.9±0.3 mm, p<0.001). Luminal diameter was unrelated to strut thickness or stented vessel, but was significantly smaller for vertically oriented stents (p=0.017), cobalt alloy compared to stainless steel (p=0.011), and varied by stent type (p=0.006).

Why it matters

This study quantifies the degree of artificial lumen reduction caused by MDCT blooming artifacts, highlighting specific stent materials and orientations that hinder accurate non-invasive assessment of in-stent restenosis.

Limits

The study is limited to 40-slice MDCT technology, which has lower spatial resolution than newer generation scanners. The sample was predominantly male (81%), and the abstract does not report clinical outcomes or diagnostic accuracy for actual restenosis detection.

Cited by