von Schacky · Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.) 2007 · narrative review · n=?

Cardiovascular risk and the omega-3 index.

Cited 46 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review and expert opinion without new empirical data or systematic review methodology

PubMed 17876200 · doi:10.2459/01.JCM.0000289273.87803.87 · record verified 2026-08-29

What was done

This narrative review summarizes evidence supporting the clinical use of the omega-3 index—defined as the combined percentage of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in red blood cell membranes—as a standardized biomarker for sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk assessment and therapeutic monitoring.

What was found

The review highlights epidemiological findings showing a steep risk reduction for SCD between an omega-3 index of 3.3% (relative risk 1.0) and 6.5% (relative risk 0.1). The authors note that EPA and DHA demonstrate antiarrhythmic effects at supraventricular and ventricular levels.

Why it matters

It promotes red blood cell membrane EPA+DHA percentage as a standardized, modifiable biomarker for stratifying SCD risk and guiding dietary or therapeutic interventions.

Limits

The abstract describes a narrative review and expert proposal rather than an original empirical study or systematic review. No confidence intervals, sample sizes, or baseline cohort characteristics are provided.

Cited by