Viswanathan · Evidence report/technology assessment 2007 · systematic review · n=107 studies

Management of uterine fibroids: an update of the evidence.

Cited 96 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review of comparative and observational studies

PubMed 18288885 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

The RTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-based Practice Center conducted a systematic review updating evidence on uterine fibroid management, evaluating incidence, prevalence, treatment outcomes, comparative effectiveness, modifiers, and costs. Searches spanned MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Collaboration databases for English-language articles published from February 2000 through August 2006. Case series with fewer than 100 participants and cohort studies with fewer than 40 participants were excluded. A total of 107 studies met inclusion criteria and underwent quality assessment.

What was found

Of the 107 included studies, 3 were rated good quality, 56 fair, and 48 poor. Cumulative incidence of uterine fibroids by age 50 reached 70% to 80%, with higher risk at younger ages in Black women. Preoperative medical management reduced fibroid volume but lacked adequate evidence showing improvements in major operative outcomes. Weak evidence supported hysteroscopic treatment of submucous fibroids for women desiring pregnancy. Studies of uterine artery embolization (UAE) reported shorter procedure times and hospital stays compared to other procedures, but complication rates showed inconsistent directions of effect and longer-term outcomes were missing. No well-conducted U.S. trials directly compared common interventions (including hysterectomy, myomectomy, or expectant management) regarding treatment objectives, while treatment costs continued to rise.

Why it matters

Despite fibroids affecting the majority of women by age 50, clinicians and patients lack high-quality comparative trial data to evaluate the relative risks, benefits, and long-term outcomes of major medical and surgical interventions.

Limits

The evidence base is dominated by low-quality research, with only 3 of 107 studies rated good quality. Direct head-to-head trials in U.S. populations, evaluations of expectant management, tracking of fibroid recurrence or regrowth, and long-term safety and fertility outcomes were largely absent from the literature.

Cited by