Holst · Molecular pharmacology 2009 · In vitro site-directed mutagenesis and functional assay · n=?

Overlapping binding site for the endogenous agonist, small-molecule agonists, and ago-allosteric modulators on the ghrelin receptor.

Cited 60 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

In vitro receptor mutagenesis and molecular modeling study

PubMed 18923064 · doi:10.1124/mol.108.049189 · record verified 2026-08-27

What was done

Single amino acid substitutions were introduced at 22 positions within the ligand-binding pocket of the ghrelin receptor. Researchers evaluated receptor activation by measuring inositol phosphate turnover in response to six agonists: two peptides (endogenous ghrelin and GHRP-6) and four synthetic nonpeptide agonists (L-692,429, MK-677, SM-130686, and SM-157740). They also evaluated the allosteric modulation of ghrelin efficacy by L-692,429 and GHRP-6, and computationally docked nonpeptide ligands into a rhodopsin-based receptor homology model.

What was found

The GluIII:09-to-Gln mutation in transmembrane domain III (TM-III) caused the strongest decrease in potency across all six agonists. Substitutions at PheVI:16, ArgVI:20, and PheVI:23 on TM-VI also reduced potency for all six ligands, while individual agonists showed additional selective mutational hits. The mutational map for ago-allosteric modulation by L-692,429 and GHRP-6 overlapped with, but was not identical to, their agonism map. No numerical potency values or fold-changes were reported in the abstract.

Why it matters

This study shows that endogenous peptides, small-molecule agonists, and ago-allosteric modulators share a common core binding pocket spanning TM-III and TM-VI on the ghrelin receptor. This maps key contact points to guide the rational design of synthetic ghrelin receptor ligands.

Limits

The study is restricted to in vitro mutational functional assays and molecular modeling without in vivo validation. The abstract reports no numerical data such as EC50 values, binding affinities, or exact sample sizes. Molecular docking relied on an inactive rhodopsin template rather than an experimental ghrelin receptor structure.

Cited by