Rowlands · Journal of strength and conditioning research 2009 · Meta-analysis · n=9 studies (394 participants)

Effects of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate supplementation during resistance training on strength, body composition, and muscle damage in trained and untrained young men: a meta-analysis.

Cited 76 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Meta-analysis of resistance training trials

PubMed 19387395 · doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a00c80 · record verified 2026-08-29

What was done

Meta-analysis of 9 qualifying studies (14 comparisons, 394 male subjects, mean age 23 ± 2 years, mean intervention duration 5 ± 2 weeks, 5 ± 6 h/week training) evaluating the effects of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB) during resistance training. A meta-analytic mixed model weighted by sample size evaluated upper-body, lower-body, and overall strength, fat and fat-free mass, and creatine kinase, adjusting for training status (trained vs. untrained), HMB dose, intervention duration, training load, and dietary cointerventions.

What was found

In untrained lifters, HMB supplementation resulted in small gains in lower-body strength (mean ± 90% confidence limit: 9.9% ± 5.9%) and average strength (6.6% ± 5.7%), with negligible upper-body gains (2.1% ± 5.5%). In trained lifters, all strength outcomes were trivial. Across all participants combined, overall strength improvement was trivial (3.7% ± 2.4%). Effects on fat and fat-free mass were trivial, and effects on creatine kinase were unclear.

Why it matters

This meta-analysis indicates that HMB offers modest strength benefits strictly to novice lifters during early training, whereas it has trivial effects on strength or body composition in trained individuals.

Limits

The total sample was relatively small (394 subjects across 9 trials) with short durations averaging 5 weeks. Findings apply only to young men, and outcomes for muscle damage (creatine kinase) remained unclear.

Cited by