Heinemann · European journal of clinical pharmacology 1991 · Randomized parallel intestinal perfusion trial · n=?

Mechanisms of action of plant sterols on inhibition of cholesterol absorption. Comparison of sitosterol and sitostanol.

Cited 209 times in the scientific literature.

Level 2 - randomized trial

Randomized clinical perfusion trial

PubMed 2044646 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

Normal volunteers underwent an intestinal perfusion study to compare the effects of two plant sterols on cholesterol absorption. Following a baseline control period, subjects were randomized to receive a high-dose intestinal infusion (3.6 µmol/min) of either sitosterol (Group I) or sitostanol (Group II).

What was found

Baseline cholesterol absorption during the control period was similar between groups: 0.88 ± 0.48 µmol/min (32 ± 11%) in the sitosterol group and 0.68 ± 0.33 µmol/min (29 ± 9%) in the sitostanol group. Sitosterol infusion significantly reduced cholesterol absorption to 0.47 µmol/min (16%), representing an overall reduction of almost 50%. Sitostanol infusion reduced cholesterol absorption to 0.15 ± 0.11 µmol/min (5.1 ± 2.9%), representing an overall reduction of almost 85%.

Why it matters

This study provides direct physiological evidence in humans that sitostanol is markedly more effective than sitosterol at inhibiting cholesterol absorption, supporting the mechanism of competitive displacement of cholesterol from mixed micelles due to higher sterol hydrophobicity.

Limits

The abstract does not state the sample size or participant characteristics beyond describing them as normal volunteers. The experimental setup used acute, direct high-dose intestinal infusions rather than chronic oral dietary intake, and long-term lipid outcomes were not measured.

Cited by