Weintraub · Archives of neurology 2010 · multicenter cross-sectional study · n=3090

Impulse control disorders in Parkinson disease: a cross-sectional study of 3090 patients.

Cited 1476 times in the scientific literature.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Multicenter cross-sectional observational study.

PubMed 20457959 · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2010.65 · record verified 2026-08-31

What was done

A cross-sectional study assessed point prevalence and risk factors for four impulse control disorders (problem/pathological gambling, compulsive sexual behavior, compulsive buying, and binge-eating disorder) across 46 movement disorder centers in the United States and Canada. A total of 3,090 patients receiving routine care for treated idiopathic Parkinson disease were evaluated by raters blinded to medication status using validated screening tools (Massachusetts Gambling Screen, Minnesota Impulsive Disorders Interview, and DSM research criteria for binge eating).

What was found

An impulse control disorder (ICD) was present in 13.6% of patients overall (gambling 5.0%, compulsive buying 5.7%, binge-eating 4.3%, compulsive sexual behavior 3.5%), and 3.9% had two or more ICDs. Patients taking a dopamine agonist had higher rates of ICDs than those not on an agonist (17.1% vs 6.9%; OR 2.72, 95% CI 2.08–3.54, P < .001). Rates did not significantly differ between pramipexole (17.7%) and ropinirole (15.5%; OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.94–1.57, P = .14). Other factors independently associated with ICDs included levodopa use, younger age, unmarried status, living in the United States, current cigarette smoking, and a family history of gambling problems.

Why it matters

This large multicenter study established that impulse control disorders are common in Parkinson disease and reflect a class-wide association with dopamine agonists alongside specific demographic and clinical vulnerability factors.

Limits

The cross-sectional design cannot establish causality or determine the longitudinal course of impulse control disorders after medication changes. Findings from specialized movement disorder centers may not fully generalize to community-treated populations, and medication dosage/duration effects were not reported in the abstract.

Cited by