Lorenz · European heart journal 2010 · prospective cohort study · n=4904

Is carotid intima media thickness useful for individual prediction of cardiovascular risk? Ten-year results from the Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study (CAPS).

Cited 231 times in the scientific literature.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Prospective cohort study evaluating prognostic performance and risk reclassification

PubMed 20530503 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq189 · record verified 2026-08-27

What was done

Researchers evaluated 4,904 subjects without pre-existing vascular disease from the Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study (CAPS) over 10 years of follow-up for cardiovascular events and total mortality. Using Cox models and reclassification statistics (net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement), they tested whether adding carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) improved individual risk prediction beyond traditional Framingham and SCORE models across 10-year risk strata of 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, and >=20%.

What was found

cIMT was significantly and independently predictive for cardiovascular events. Adding common cIMT to the Framingham model led to the reclassification of 357 subjects (8.1%), but this reclassification was correct in only 107 subjects (30.0%). Net reclassification improvement was -1.41% (P = NS) and integrated discrimination improvement was 0.04% (P = NS), with more subjects shifted to lower rather than higher risk categories. Analyses using other endpoint definitions, other carotid segments, and the SCORE model also failed to consistently improve risk prediction.

Why it matters

Despite its independent association with cardiovascular endpoints, cIMT measurement does not add clinically useful discriminative or reclassification value beyond standard risk scores in the general population.

Limits

The abstract does not provide exact effect estimates (hazard ratios, confidence intervals) or precise P-values. Baseline demographic characteristics, setting, and potential changes in medical therapy during the 10-year follow-up are not detailed in the abstract.

Cited by