Miki · Stem cell research & therapy 2011 · narrative review · n=?

Amnion-derived stem cells: in quest of clinical applications.

Cited 126 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review and theoretical model with no new human trial data or systematic synthesis

PubMed 21596003 · doi:10.1186/scrt66 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

The authors reviewed published literature on human perinatal stem cells isolated from term placentae, focusing on amniotic epithelial (AE) cells. They described a model theory explaining why term amniotic epithelium contains a high proportion of stem-cell marker-positive cells, reviewed preclinical therapeutic applications, and analyzed potential biological and methodological pitfalls in amnion-derived stem cell research.

What was found

The abstract reports no quantitative data or statistical comparisons. It qualitatively notes that term human amniotic epithelial cells display stem-cell markers, possess pluripotent differentiation capacity, and present fewer ethical issues and less DNA damage than alternative stem cell sources.

Why it matters

Amnion-derived stem cells represent an accessible, non-controversial biological source derived from discarded tissue that may bypass key ethical and genomic-damage concerns in regenerative medicine.

Limits

This is a narrative review presenting theoretical models and summarizing previous findings without a systematic search methodology, meta-analysis, or primary clinical data. Clinical safety, long-term differentiation fidelity, and in vivo efficacy in humans are not established in the abstract.

Cited by