Langner · Psychological bulletin 2013 · quantitative meta-analysis and systematic review · n=?

Sustaining attention to simple tasks: a meta-analytic review of the neural mechanisms of vigilant attention.

Cited 753 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Level 1 by design analogy (quantitative meta-analysis and systematic review of neuroimaging studies)

PubMed 23163491 · doi:10.1037/a0030694 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

The authors performed a quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies investigating vigilant attention—the capacity to maintain focus during simple, repetitive tasks—alongside moderator analyses. They also integrated neuroimaging evidence regarding neural time-on-task effects and lesion data from individuals with focal brain damage to model the underlying neural architecture.

What was found

The abstract presents no quantitative statistics or numerical values. Qualitatively, the synthesis identified a predominantly right-lateralized core network supporting vigilant attention, encompassing dorsomedial, mid-, and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior insula, parietal regions (intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction), and subcortical areas (cerebellar vermis, thalamus, putamen, and midbrain). The authors propose vigilant attention is a nonunitary faculty relying on sustained/recurrent processes for task-set/arousal maintenance and transient processes for target-driven reorienting.

Why it matters

This paper maps the distributed, right-dominant cortico-subcortical network responsible for sustaining attention across time on unchallenging tasks, providing an anatomical framework that reconciles steady-state arousal maintenance with transient attentional capture.

Limits

The abstract does not disclose the number of included studies, sample sizes, search parameters, or specific statistical test metrics. Neuroimaging synthesis inherently reflects cross-study task heterogeneity and primarily provides correlational rather than strictly causal evidence.

Cited by