Taylor · The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2013 · systematic review and meta-analysis · n=18 studies (56,934 participants)

Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Cited 1838 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

PubMed 23440795 · doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004816.pub5 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

This Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated randomised controlled trials comparing statins to placebo or usual care in adults where 10% or fewer had a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Eligible trials required a minimum treatment duration of one year and follow-up of at least six months. Searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were updated through January 2012 without language restrictions. Two authors independently selected trials and extracted data on all-cause mortality, composite and individual CVD/coronary events, stroke, revascularisation, lipid concentrations, and adverse events.

What was found

Eighteen RCTs (19 trial arms; 56,934 participants) were included. Statins significantly reduced all-cause mortality (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94), combined fatal and non-fatal CVD events (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.81), combined fatal and non-fatal coronary heart disease events (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.80), combined fatal and non-fatal stroke (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89), and revascularisation rates (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.72). Total and LDL cholesterol were reduced across trials, though effect sizes showed heterogeneity. No evidence of excess serious adverse events was detected.

Why it matters

This review establishes that statin therapy delivers broad clinical benefits for primary prevention—including a significant reduction in all-cause mortality—with a favorable safety profile across diverse risk groups.

Limits

Fourteen of the 18 included trials specifically recruited populations with existing risk conditions (such as diabetes, hypertension, microalbuminuria, or dyslipidemia), and up to 10% of participants had prior CVD. Heterogeneity was present in the extent of cholesterol reduction across trials, and the abstract provides limited quantitative detail on quality-of-life and cost-effectiveness measures.

Cited by