Klimecki · Social cognitive and affective neuroscience 2014 · controlled neuroimaging experimental study · n=?

Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training.

Cited 689 times in the scientific literature.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Controlled neuroimaging study with an active control group; randomization is not specified in the abstract.

PubMed 23576808 · doi:10.1093/scan/nst060 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

Participants underwent training in empathic resonance followed by compassion training, while a control group received memory training. Functional neuroimaging and self-reported affect were evaluated in response to videos depicting human suffering to assess functional neural plasticity and emotional changes associated with each training modality.

What was found

No numerical values or sample sizes are reported in the abstract. Empathy training, compared to memory training, increased self-reported negative affect and elevated brain activations in the anterior insula and anterior midcingulate cortex. Subsequent compassion training reversed the increase in negative affect, augmented self-reported positive affect, and activated a distinct neural network including the ventral striatum, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, and medial orbitofrontal cortex.

Why it matters

The findings demonstrate that empathy and compassion engage distinct neural circuits, suggesting compassion training can counteract empathic distress and serve as a coping mechanism against burnout.

Limits

The abstract does not disclose participant sample size, demographics, statistical effect sizes, or whether participants were randomized. The empathy group received compassion training only after empathy training (fixed sequence), making it difficult to isolate compassion effects from sequence or carryover effects.

Cited by