Harvie · The British journal of nutrition 2013 · randomized controlled trial · n=115

The effect of intermittent energy and carbohydrate restriction v. daily energy restriction on weight loss and metabolic disease risk markers in overweight women.

Cited 460 times in the scientific literature.

Level 2 - randomized trial

Individual randomized controlled trial

PubMed 23591120 · doi:10.1017/S0007114513000792 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

Overweight women (n = 115, aged 20 to 69 years with a family history of breast cancer) were randomized to an overall 25% energy restriction for a 3-month weight-loss period followed by a 1-month maintenance phase. The three arms were: intermittent energy and carbohydrate restriction (IECR: 2500-2717 kJ/d, <40 g carbohydrate/d for 2 d/week), daily energy restriction (DER: approximately 6000 kJ/d for 7 d/week), or IECR with ad libitum protein and fat (IECR+PF for 2 d/week). Maintenance was 1 d/week for the intermittent groups.

What was found

Insulin resistance decreased with IECR (mean -0.34 [95% CI -0.66, -0.02] units) and IECR+PF (mean -0.38 [95% CI -0.75, -0.01] units), with significantly greater reductions than DER (mean 0.2 [95% CI -0.19, 0.66] uU/unit, P = 0.02). Both intermittent groups achieved greater body fat reductions compared with DER (IECR: mean -3.7 [95% CI -2.5, -4.9] kg, P = 0.007; IECR+PF: mean -3.7 [95% CI -2.8, -4.7] kg, P = 0.019; DER: mean -2.0 [95% CI -1.0, 3.0] kg). During the 1-month maintenance phase, 1 d/week of IECR or IECR+PF maintained the reductions.

Why it matters

Intermittent restriction of energy and carbohydrates two days per week may be more effective for reducing body fat and improving insulin resistance than standard daily calorie cutting in the short term.

Limits

The trial included only women with a family history of breast cancer, limiting generalizability to men and other populations. The follow-up was short (3 months of restriction, 1 month maintenance), and long-term adherence and safety were not established.

Cited by