Wright · Current biology : CB 2013 · environmental intervention / comparative study · n=?

Entrainment of the human circadian clock to the natural light-dark cycle.

Cited 800 times in the scientific literature.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Non-randomized environmental intervention study (pre/post or cross-environment comparison without randomized control)

PubMed 23910656 · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.06.039 · record verified 2026-08-31

What was done

Researchers evaluated the timing of the human circadian clock and light exposure patterns in a modern constructed environment with electrical lighting compared to a natural summer light-dark cycle (14 hr 40 min light : 9 hr 20 min dark) during a camping setting.

What was found

No quantitative effect estimates or variance statistics are provided in the abstract. Modern environments were associated with reduced daytime sunlight, increased post-sunset light exposure, and a delayed circadian clock relative to natural lighting. Natural light exposure shifted the biological night to begin at sunset and end before waking after sunrise. Later chronotypes experienced greater circadian advances than earlier chronotypes under natural light, narrowing the timing differences between chronotypes.

Why it matters

This work shows that modern artificial lighting delays human circadian timing and that natural light-dark cycles can restore alignment between internal biological rhythms and solar time.

Limits

The abstract does not disclose the sample size, participant demographics, study duration, or specific numerical data. Potential confounding factors such as differences in physical activity, temperature, and lifestyle between modern living and camping are not described.

Cited by