Glim · Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society 2013 · narrative review · n=?

Detrimental dermal wound healing: what can we learn from the oral mucosa?

Cited 195 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review synthesizing mechanistic and physiological literature

PubMed 23927738 · doi:10.1111/wrr.12072 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

This narrative review synthesized published literature comparing the biological and cellular mechanisms underlying scar-forming dermal wound healing versus accelerated, minimally scarred oral mucosal wound healing.

What was found

The abstract provides no numerical data. It reports qualitatively that oral mucosal wounds, compared with dermal wounds, exhibit different extracellular matrix expression (including procollagen I and tenascin-C), fewer immune mediators, fewer blood vessels, fewer profibrotic mediators, more bone marrow-derived cells, faster fibroblast proliferation, and an increased rate of reepithelialization.

Why it matters

Understanding the specific cellular and matrix pathways that allow oral mucosa to heal rapidly without prominent fibrosis may identify therapeutic targets to prevent or reduce scarring in dermal wounds.

Limits

As a narrative review, it lacks systematic search criteria, quality appraisal, and sample sizes. The abstract reports no quantitative effect sizes or confidence intervals, relying entirely on descriptive mechanistic comparisons.

Cited by