Bishop · Biochimica et biophysica acta 2014 · narrative review · n=?

Can we optimise the exercise training prescription to maximise improvements in mitochondria function and content?

Cited 189 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review synthesizing rodent and human experimental studies without systematic methodology

PubMed 24128929 · doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.10.012 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

The authors conducted a narrative review of cross-sectional and training studies in both rats and humans to examine the distinct impacts of exercise intensity and exercise volume on mitochondrial function (measured by mitochondrial respiration) and mitochondrial content (assessed via citrate synthase activity).

What was found

The abstract reports no numerical values or effect sizes. Qualitatively, exercise training intensity was reported as an important determinant of mitochondrial function rather than content, whereas training volume was reported as a primary determinant of mitochondrial content. These adaptations were noted to reverse quickly after activity reduction or cessation.

Why it matters

Identifying separate training determinants for mitochondrial quality versus quantity helps guide more precise exercise prescriptions for metabolic health and athletic performance.

Limits

The review relies on a small body of literature combining rodent and human studies without meta-analytic pooling. Quantitative effect sizes are not reported in the abstract, and adaptations across specific mitochondrial sub-populations, muscle fiber types, and genetic backgrounds remain uncharacterized.

Cited by