Albers · The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2014 · systematic review and meta-analysis · n=29 studies (2,906 participants)

Interventions for preventing neuropathy caused by cisplatin and related compounds.

Cited 301 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PubMed 24687190 · doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005228.pub4 · record verified 2026-08-29

What was done

This Cochrane systematic review searched multiple databases through March 2013 for randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials evaluating chemoprotective agents (including amifostine, calcium/magnesium, glutathione, Org 2766, vitamin E, acetylcysteine, diethyldithiocarbamate, oxcarbazepine, and retinoic acid) compared with placebo, no treatment, or active comparators in patients receiving cisplatin or related chemotherapy. The primary outcome was quantitative sensory testing (QST) evaluated zero to six months post-chemotherapy; secondary outcomes included nerve conduction studies and validated clinical toxicity scales such as the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC).

What was found

The review included 29 trials with 2,906 participants. Only seven trials reported primary QST data and nine reported nerve conduction test results. In secondary subjective outcomes, amifostine significantly reduced the risk of developing NCI-CTC grade ≥ 2 neurotoxicity compared to placebo (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.61; 15 pooled trials for NCI-CTC), as did glutathione (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.85). Three vitamin E trials each favoured the intervention on subjective non-pooled measures. Adverse effects included transient hypotension with amifostine (8% to 62%), hypocalcemia with retinoic acid (11%), and toxic withdrawals with diethyldithiocarbamate (~20%).

Why it matters

Despite promising subjective symptom reductions with agents such as amifostine and glutathione, there remains insufficient objective evidence to support any chemoprotective agent for platinum-induced neurotoxicity.

Limits

Only a minority of trials evaluated the primary objective outcome of quantitative sensory testing, often with very small cohorts (e.g., 14 completing participants in the single amifostine QST trial). Methodological heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis for most objective endpoints, and risk of bias could frequently not be determined due to underreporting.

Cited by