Derefinko · Journal of personality 2015 · meta-analysis · n=?

Psychopathy and Low Anxiety: Meta-Analytic Evidence for the Absence of Inhibition, Not Affect.

Cited 71 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Meta-analysis of observational studies; rated Level 1 by design analogy, not clinical CEBM.

PubMed 25130868 · doi:10.1111/jopy.12124 · record verified 2026-08-28

What was done

The authors conducted three meta-analyses evaluating the relationships between psychopathy (total score and Factor 1 and Factor 2 scores) and three separate parsed components of the low anxiety construct: anxiety, fear, and constraint.

What was found

The abstract reports qualitative directions and relative magnitudes without numerical effect sizes, sample sizes, or confidence intervals: - Psychopathy Total was negligibly related to anxiety and fear, but showed a medium negative relation with constraint. - Psychopathy Factor 1 was negatively related to anxiety, fear, and constraint. - Psychopathy Factor 2 was positively related to anxiety and negatively related to constraint.

Why it matters

These findings help resolve ambiguity in psychopathy research by demonstrating that psychopathy entails deficits in behavioral inhibition and constraint rather than a generalized absence of negative affect.

Limits

The abstract does not state the number of studies, sample sizes, exact effect sizes, or confidence intervals. The underlying primary literature consists of observational correlational studies, leaving potential for residual confounding and measurement variation across different psychopathy instruments.

Cited by