Harrison · International journal of environmental health research 2015 · Narrative review · n=?

On the biological plausibility of Wind Turbine Syndrome.

Cited 12 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review based on mechanistic and physiological reasoning without new empirical data.

PubMed 25295915 · doi:10.1080/09603123.2014.963034 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

This review examined the biological plausibility of whether low-frequency acoustic components from wind turbine noise can stimulate the vestibular system (semicircular canals and otolith end organs) in healthy individuals and in those with preexisting conditions that lower vestibular acoustic activation thresholds.

What was found

The abstract reports no empirical findings or numerical data. It outlines a conceptual and physiological discussion evaluating whether sound levels generated by wind turbines reach thresholds necessary to trigger vestibular activation and symptoms attributed to "Wind Turbine Syndrome."

Why it matters

Assessing biological mechanisms helps establish whether reported vestibular symptoms near wind farms (such as vertigo, nausea, and nystagmus) are physiologically feasible consequences of low-frequency sound exposure.

Limits

The paper is an unsystematic narrative review offering mechanistic reasoning rather than direct experimental or clinical trial data. The abstract provides no quantitative noise thresholds, empirical results, or study counts.

Cited by