El-Sakka · Arab journal of urology 2011 · narrative review · n=?

Reversion of penile fibrosis: Current information and a new horizon.

Cited 27 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review synthesizing mechanistic concepts without systematic search or original data.

PubMed 26579268 · doi:10.1016/j.aju.2011.03.013 · record verified 2026-08-27

What was done

This narrative review summarizes literature regarding the underlying etiology of corporal and tunical penile fibrosis, focusing on aging, cavernous nerve damage, androgen deprivation, chronic ischemia, and strategies for preventing associated erectile dysfunction.

What was found

The abstract reports qualitative mechanistic findings without quantitative data or sample sizes. Key mechanisms described include aging-related penile atherosclerosis leading to decreased oxygen tension, smooth muscle cell loss, reduced nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate signaling, increased alpha-adrenoceptor sensitivity, and altered collagen ratios reducing elasticity. Additionally, androgen deprivation is described as causing penile tissue atrophy, dorsal nerve and endothelial alterations, reduced trabecular smooth muscle content, extracellular matrix deposition, and subtunical adipocyte accumulation.

Why it matters

It outlines how structural and hormonal factors combine to drive penile fibrosis, highlighting targets for preserving erectile function during aging or following nerve or androgen injury.

Limits

The abstract provides no quantitative metrics, effect estimates, or statistical data. As a narrative review, it lacks systematic search methodology, quality assessment of cited studies, and new empirical human trial data.

Cited by