Andersen · Clinical drug investigation 2016 · narrative review · n=?

The Safety of Melatonin in Humans.

Cited 474 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review synthesizing published animal and human data without reported systematic review protocol.

PubMed 26692007 · doi:10.1007/s40261-015-0368-5 · record verified 2026-08-28

What was done

The authors reviewed the published literature evaluating the safety, potential adverse effects, and risk profiles of exogenous melatonin administration in humans and animals, including specific patient subgroups.

What was found

The abstract reports no numerical values or counts. Qualitatively, short-term melatonin was reported safe even at extreme doses, with only mild adverse events identified (dizziness, headache, nausea, and sleepiness) and no serious adverse effects. Randomized trials of long-term use indicated adverse effects were mild and comparable to placebo. Human safety data are lacking for pregnant and breast-feeding populations, and long-term data in children and adolescents remain incomplete.

Why it matters

This paper consolidates broad clinical evidence on melatonin tolerability, confirming general adult safety while emphasizing caution and evidence gaps for pediatric and maternal use.

Limits

The abstract provides no sample size, search methodology, dosing parameters, or quantitative effect sizes. As a narrative review, it is vulnerable to selection bias, and human evidence is absent for pregnancy and lactation.

Cited by