Fallon · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2016 · narrative review · n=?

Causes and consequences of limitations in visual working memory.

Cited 36 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review synthesizing cognitive neuroscience theory without systematic review methodology.

PubMed 26773268 · doi:10.1111/nyas.12992 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

This narrative review synthesized recent conceptual and methodological developments regarding the nature, capacity limits, and neural architecture of visual working memory (WM).

What was found

The abstract reports no numerical data. It describes evidence favoring a flexible resource model over discrete item-capacity limits, where prioritizing certain items reduces recall precision for others. It identifies neural mechanisms involved in this architecture: alpha-band oscillations mediating selective inhibition, early visual cortex maintaining items in the focus of attention, the striatum controlling memory gating, and the hippocampus potentially supporting feature binding.

Why it matters

This work outlines a conceptual shift in cognitive neuroscience from rigid, prefrontal-centric storage slots to distributed, resource-based visual working memory allocation.

Limits

As a narrative review, the paper provides no empirical sample, quantitative effect sizes, systematic search strategy, or explicit study selection criteria in the abstract.

Cited by