Prokop · Anthropologischer Anzeiger; Bericht uber die biologisch-anthropologische Literatur 2016 · cross-sectional survey study · n=96

Male preference for female pubic hair: an evolutionary view.

Cited 13 times in the scientific literature.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Cross-sectional survey study (graded by design analogy for non-clinical research).

PubMed 27000945 · doi:10.1127/anthranz/2016/0583 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

A cross-sectional study surveyed 96 heterosexual male university students aged 19 to 38 years to evaluate their preferences regarding female pubic hair (hairy vs. shaved female genitalia). The study also measured self-reported disgust sensitivity, sociosexual orientation (sexual unrestrictedness), age, and pornography consumption frequency to assess associations with these aesthetic preferences.

What was found

The abstract reports no exact numerical values, effect sizes, or test statistics. Directionally, pubic hair was perceived as much less attractive than shaved female genitalia. Higher disgust sensitivity and greater sexual unrestrictedness were associated with a stronger preference for shaved genitalia. Conversely, older age and higher self-reported frequency of pornography consumption were associated with a stronger preference for hairy genitalia.

Why it matters

This study provides empirical observations regarding male sexual preferences for female body hair, framing current aesthetic trends within evolutionary hypotheses of ectoparasite avoidance and individual variation.

Limits

The sample size is small (N = 96) and restricted to a convenience sample of young university-recruited heterosexual males, limiting generalizability. The abstract reports only correlational findings without exact effect sizes, confidence intervals, or p-values, and relies entirely on self-reported measures and subjective visual or conceptual ratings.

Cited by