Managing Carious Lesions: Consensus Recommendations on Carious Tissue Removal.
Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data
Expert consensus recommendations without original empirical data reported in the abstract
PubMed 27099358 · doi:10.1177/0022034516639271
What was done
The International Caries Consensus Collaboration conducted an expert consensus process to establish clinical recommendations for managing cavitated carious lesions and determining the extent of carious tissue removal based on demineralized dentine texture.
What was found
The abstract reports no quantitative data or outcome numbers. It outlines qualitative consensus recommendations: control disease through biofilm management first; reserve restorative intervention for noncleansable or unsealable lesions; avoid removing contaminated tissue close to the pulp; perform selective removal to firm dentine for shallow or moderately deep lesions; and perform selective removal to soft dentine (or stepwise removal in permanent teeth) for deep lesions to preserve pulpal health.
Why it matters
The statement standardizes tissue-preserving clinical guidelines intended to maintain tooth structure, preserve pulp vitality, and reduce repeated restorative cycles.
Limits
The abstract reports no sample size, numerical metrics, or success rates. Details regarding the consensus methodology, systematic search criteria, or strength of underlying evidence are not described in the abstract.
Cited by
- supports Repeated replacement of dental fillings increases pulpal irritation and the risk of tooth death.