Schoenfeld · Journal of sports sciences 2017 · systematic review and meta-analysis · n=15 studies (34 treatment groups)

Dose-response relationship between weekly resistance training volume and increases in muscle mass: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cited 680 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized/comparative trials.

PubMed 27433992 · doi:10.1080/02640414.2016.1210197 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

A systematic review and meta-regression evaluated the relationship between weekly resistance training volume (measured in sets) and changes in muscle mass. The analysis included 34 treatment groups from 15 studies, examining weekly sets as a continuous variable, a two-level within-study categorical variable (lower vs. higher volume), and a three-level categorical variable (<5, 5–9, and 10+ sets per muscle weekly).

What was found

Weekly sets as a continuous variable had a statistically significant effect on muscle size changes (P = 0.002), with each additional weekly set increasing effect size by 0.023 (corresponding to a 0.37% increase in percentage gain). In the within-study categorical analysis, higher volume produced significantly greater hypertrophy than lower volume (P = 0.03; effect size difference of 0.241, representing a 3.9% difference in percentage gain). The three-level categorical analysis showed a trend that did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.074).

Why it matters

This meta-analysis provides a quantified dose-response baseline indicating that higher weekly set volumes generally yield greater muscle hypertrophy than lower volumes.

Limits

The total number of individual participants, their training status, sex, and age are not reported in the abstract. Interventions differed across trials, and the three-level categorical comparison (<5, 5–9, 10+ sets) showed only a trend (P = 0.074) rather than a statistically significant difference.

Cited by