Grant · Dermato-endocrinology 2016 · narrative review · n=?

Do studies reporting 'U'-shaped serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D-health outcome relationships reflect adverse effects?

Cited 115 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review synthesizing mechanisms and potential confounding across observational literature

PubMed 27489574 · doi:10.1080/19381980.2016.1187349 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

The author reviewed published literature examining U-shaped relationships between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations and various health outcomes—including falls, fractures, cancers, cardiovascular disease, cognitive function, all-cause mortality, birth outcomes, allergic reactions, and frailty—evaluating whether these patterns reflect genuine biological mechanisms or confounding.

What was found

The abstract reports no numerical data. Qualitatively, it states that while some U-shaped associations appear biologically plausible (such as allergic reactions potentially driven by immune phenotype shifts toward Th2 balance), many likely stem from confounding factors, including lifestyle and late self-supplementation started after disease onset. For prostate cancer, 25(OH)D concentration showed little effect on incidence but was inversely correlated with mortality rates.

Why it matters

This review cautions researchers and clinicians against assuming high normal 25(OH)D levels are inherently harmful, emphasizing the need to adjust for baseline self-supplementation and solar UVB exposure in future studies.

Limits

The abstract describes a non-systematic narrative review with no defined search protocol, study count, sample size, or quantitative effect estimates. It relies largely on observational data prone to residual confounding and reverse causation.

Cited by