Kelly · Journal of psychiatric research 2016 · Case-control study with animal fecal microbiota transplantation experiment · n=67 humans (34 depressed, 33 controls) and unspecified number of rats

Transferring the blues: Depression-associated gut microbiota induces neurobehavioural changes in the rat.

Cited 1703 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Animal interventional model (fecal microbiota transplantation in rats) combined with human case-control sampling

PubMed 27491067 · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.07.019 · record verified 2026-08-29

What was done

Researchers recruited 34 patients with major depression and 33 matched healthy controls. They measured inflammatory and endocrine markers (cytokines, CRP, salivary cortisol, and plasma lipopolysaccharide-binding protein) using ELISA, and plasma tryptophan and kynurenine using HPLC. Fecal samples underwent 16S rRNA sequencing. Fecal microbiota from a subgroup of depressed patients and controls was transferred via oral gavage into microbiota-deficient rats to evaluate neurobehavioral and physiological effects.

What was found

The abstract reports no numerical values, confidence intervals, or statistical test results. It qualitatively reports that major depression was associated with decreased gut microbiota richness and diversity. Fecal microbiota transplantation from depressed donors to microbiota-depleted rats induced depressive-like features, including anhedonia, anxiety-like behaviors, and alterations in tryptophan metabolism.

Why it matters

This study provides experimental evidence in an animal model suggesting a potential causal role for gut microbiota in the neurobehavioral and metabolic features of depression.

Limits

The abstract provides no quantitative data or effect sizes. Causal mechanisms were tested exclusively in a rodent model, limiting direct generalizability to human depression. The human cohort was small (67 total participants), and the exact number of donor samples used for transplantation as well as the number of recipient rats were not reported in the abstract.

Cited by