Silva · British journal of sports medicine 2017 · systematic review and meta-analysis · n=7 studies (478 participants)

Physical activity and exercise for erectile dysfunction: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cited 139 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PubMed 27707739 · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096418 · record verified 2026-08-27

What was done

A systematic review and meta-analysis conducted under PRISMA guidelines searched 6 electronic databases (January 1990 to July 2016) and reference lists for randomized controlled trials. Eligible studies included patients diagnosed with erectile dysfunction allocated to aerobic, pelvic floor, or combined exercise interventions versus controls. Random-effects meta-analyses evaluated mean differences in erectile function scores, including International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores, across intervention durations ranging from 8 weeks to 2 years.

What was found

Seven randomized controlled trials involving 478 participants met inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis showed a statistically significant improvement in erectile function score favoring exercise (mean difference 3.85, 95% CI 2.33 to 5.37). In sensitivity analyses, the mean difference in IIEF score remained statistically significant, ranging from 3.39 (95% CI 1.92 to 4.87) to 4.28 (95% CI 2.54 to 6.02). Benefits were reported for short-term and long-term protocols, and whether exercise was used alone or added to usual care.

Why it matters

This meta-analysis quantifies the therapeutic benefit of structured physical activity, particularly moderate-to-vigorous aerobic exercise, as an effective non-pharmacological intervention for erectile dysfunction.

Limits

The total sample size across all included trials was small (478 participants across 7 studies). Primary trials exhibited moderate to high risk of bias due to lack of participant/personnel blinding and questionable blinding of outcome assessors for subjective self-reported measures. Specific exercise modalities, baseline severity subgroups, and adverse events were not detailed in the abstract.

Cited by