Escobar · The British journal of nutrition 2016 · narrative review · n=?

Carbohydrate intake and resistance-based exercise: are current recommendations reflective of actual need?

Cited 28 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review evaluating carbohydrate requirements and cellular mechanisms in resistance exercise without systematic methodology

PubMed 27993175 · doi:10.1017/S0007114516003949 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

The authors conducted a review examining the empirical and physiological evidence surrounding dietary carbohydrate requirements for resistance-based exercise performance, glycogen depletion, and downstream cell signaling mediating adaptation.

What was found

Current guidelines recommend a moderately high daily carbohydrate intake of 3–7 g/kg per day, derived primarily from endurance exercise research. The abstract reports that true glycogen depletion is unlikely to occur during standard resistance training. Furthermore, acute resistance exercise performance and mTORC1 (mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1) signaling pathways appear unaffected by carbohydrate restriction or low muscle glycogen concentrations. No specific quantitative performance metrics were reported in the abstract.

Why it matters

It questions the standard practice of extrapolating high-carbohydrate endurance nutrition guidelines to resistance-trained populations, suggesting that lower carbohydrate intakes may adequately support resistance exercise performance and anabolic signaling.

Limits

This is a narrative review presenting mechanistic arguments rather than a systematic review or meta-analysis. The abstract provides no primary human trial data, exact sample numbers, or quantitative effect sizes comparing performance outcomes across differing carbohydrate doses.

Cited by