Strigo · Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences 2016 · Narrative review and theoretical framework with experimental data · n=?

Interoception, homeostatic emotions and sympathovagal balance.

Cited 284 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review and theoretical neuroanatomical framework incorporating mechanistic animal and human imaging data

PubMed 28080968 · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0010 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

The authors reviewed neuroanatomical evidence for human interoception and outlined a theoretical model where bodily feelings processed in the insular cortex are paired with homeostatic motivations in the cingulate cortex. They integrated physiological data on cardiorespiratory vagal activity in monkeys and functional magnetic resonance imaging data in healthy humans performing paced breathing and passive viewing of emotional images to propose an asymmetric forebrain model of emotional and sympathovagal regulation.

What was found

The abstract reports no quantitative values or statistical effect sizes. Qualitatively, the authors describe a hierarchical sensorimotor architecture supporting homeostatic emotions, wherein the bicameral forebrain organizes positive/negative valence, approach/avoidance behaviors, and parasympathetic/sympathetic balance into asymmetric hemispheric components modulated by respiratory and affective stimuli.

Why it matters

The paper presents a neuroanatomical framework linking visceral physiological sensing to subjective emotional experience and autonomic control, conceptualizing bodily feelings as core drivers of adaptive behavior.

Limits

The abstract provides no sample sizes, demographic details, or quantitative outcomes for the cited monkey physiology or human neuroimaging experiments. As predominantly a conceptual review and theoretical framework, its structural models rely largely on correlational imaging and mechanistic reasoning rather than direct causal evidence.

Cited by