Krogh · United European gastroenterology journal 2017 · narrative review · n=?

Management of chronic constipation in adults.

Cited 88 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative clinical review without systematic methodology or primary human trial data.

PubMed 28588875 · doi:10.1177/2050640616663439 · record verified 2026-08-28

What was done

Narrative review outlining the diagnostic approach and stepwise clinical management algorithm for chronic constipation in adult primary and secondary care settings.

What was found

The abstract reports that chronic constipation has an estimated prevalence of up to 24%. No further quantitative outcome data or comparative effect sizes are provided. The authors outline a stepped care pathway: initial lifestyle modifications (dietary fiber, fluid intake, exercise) followed by osmotic or stimulant laxatives; second-line prokinetics and secretagogues; physiological testing (anorectal physiology, colorectal transit time, evacuation proctography) for non-responders or suspected structural defects; biofeedback for dyssynergic defecation; rectal therapies or transanal irrigation for evacuation disorders; and surgery strictly for severe, treatment-refractory disease.

Why it matters

It provides a structured, stepwise decision framework for clinicians to systematically escalate treatment from simple primary care interventions to advanced physiological testing and specialized therapies.

Limits

As a narrative review, it lacks a systematic literature search, formal risk-of-bias evaluation, and quantitative meta-analytic comparisons. Specific drug dosages, absolute response rates, and comparative efficacy metrics are not reported in the abstract.

Cited by