Kreider · Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition 2017 · narrative review / position stand · n=?

International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine.

Cited 830 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review and expert consensus position stand without systematic review or meta-analysis.

PubMed 28615996 · doi:10.1186/s12970-017-0173-z · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

The International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN) reviewed the literature to update its position stand on the safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, athletic performance, recovery, injury prevention, and diverse clinical medical applications.

What was found

The review reported that creatine supplementation increases intramuscular creatine concentrations, improving high-intensity exercise performance and training adaptations. Benefits were noted for post-exercise recovery, injury prevention, thermoregulation, and neuroprotection across several clinical indications. Quantitatively, the abstract reports that supplementation up to 30 g/day for 5 years is safe and well-tolerated in populations ranging from infants to the elderly, and habitual low intake of 3 g/day may provide health benefits across the lifespan. No specific numerical effect sizes or trial statistics are provided in the abstract.

Why it matters

This position stand provides an authoritative consensus affirming creatine's safety profile over long durations and broadening its application from athletic ergogenics to clinical and lifespan health.

Limits

The abstract describes a narrative position stand rather than a systematic review or meta-analysis, providing no systematic search criteria, quality scoring, or pooled statistical effect sizes. Many clinical indications mentioned remain emerging or heterogeneous.

Cited by