Hanschen · Frontiers in plant science 2017 · Laboratory phytochemical profiling study · n=?

Isothiocyanates, Nitriles, and Epithionitriles from Glucosinolates Are Affected by Genotype and Developmental Stage in Brassica oleracea Varieties.

Cited 152 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Bench/agricultural plant phytochemical research with no human participants (Level 5 by design analogy).

PubMed 28690627 · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01095 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

Researchers evaluated glucosinolate content and their breakdown products (isothiocyanates, nitriles, and epithionitriles) across sprouts and fully developed heads from various genotypes of five Brassica oleracea varieties (broccoli, cauliflower, white cabbage, red cabbage, and savoy cabbage). They also assessed the effect of developmental stage on glucosinolate hydrolysis profiles during three head-development phases: mini, fully developed, and over-mature.

What was found

Broccoli and red cabbage were predominantly rich in glucoraphanin [4-(methylsulfinyl)butyl glucosinolate], whereas cauliflower, savoy cabbage, and white cabbage mainly contained sinigrin (2-propenyl glucosinolate) and glucoiberin [3-(methylsulfinyl)propyl glucosinolate]. Epithionitriles or nitriles frequently formed the main hydrolysis products, with 1-cyano-2,3-epithiopropane reaching up to 5.7 μmol/g fresh weight in white cabbage sprouts. Sprouts generally contained more than 10 times more glucosinolates or their hydrolysis products compared to fully developed vegetables. Among head developmental stages, mini heads produced the highest concentrations of isothiocyanates.

Why it matters

Because isothiocyanates (rather than nitriles or epithionitriles) are primarily linked to chemoprotective effects, identifying harvest stages and cultivars that optimize isothiocyanate yield provides actionable guidance for agricultural production and consumer dietary selection.

Limits

The study is purely an in vitro plant chemical analysis; biological bioavailability, metabolism, cooking effects, and human health endpoints were not measured. Sample sizes across specific genotypes and replicates were not detailed in the abstract.

Cited by