Doğramacı · Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) 2017 · systematic review and meta-analysis · n=7 studies

Malocclusions in young children: Does breast-feeding really reduce the risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cited 39 times in the scientific literature.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

PubMed 28754184 · doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2017.05.018 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies (prospective, retrospective longitudinal, case-control, and analytical cross-sectional) evaluating the association between breastfeeding history and malocclusions in healthy children with primary dentition. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality using standardized instruments. Meta-analyses used random-effects models, supplemented by fixed-effects models when heterogeneity was 50% or less as measured by the I-squared statistic.

What was found

Seven studies were included. Breastfeeding for less than 12 months was significantly associated with an increased risk of anterior open bite (n = 1,875; risk ratio 3.58, 95% CI 2.55 to 5.03, P < .00001) and class II canine relationship (n = 1,203; risk ratio 1.65, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.97, P < .00001). An increased risk was also reported for posterior crossbite, but no numerical effect size was provided in the abstract.

Why it matters

This review provides quantitative evidence that breastfeeding for at least 12 months is associated with lower risks of specific malocclusions in primary dentition. It supports breastfeeding promotion in pediatric oral health while recognizing that malocclusion etiology remains multifactorial.

Limits

The review included only 7 studies, all with observational designs subject to confounding and recall bias. The abstract does not report numerical risk ratios or sample sizes for posterior crossbite, exact heterogeneity values, or the total pooled sample size across all included studies.

Cited by