Grgic · Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 2018 · systematic review · n=23 studies (491 participants)

Effects of Rest Interval Duration in Resistance Training on Measures of Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review.

Cited 154 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review of controlled resistance training intervention studies

PubMed 28933024 · doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0788-x · record verified 2026-08-29

What was done

A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines across five electronic databases to evaluate chronic muscular strength adaptations to resistance training interventions comparing different rest interval durations. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality using a modified Downs and Black checklist.

What was found

Twenty-three studies with a total of 491 participants (413 males and 78 females) met inclusion criteria, all rated as good to moderate quality. The abstract reports no quantitative pooled effect sizes, confidence intervals, or p-values. Qualitatively, robust strength gains were observed even with short rest intervals (< 60 s), but maximizing strength gains appears to require longer rest (> 2 min) in trained individuals and short-to-moderate rest (60-120 s) in untrained individuals.

Why it matters

This review synthesizes chronic training adaptations to show that rest interval requirements for strength maximization differ according to an individual's training status.

Limits

The abstract provides no meta-analytic effect sizes or quantitative outcome statistics. The included sample is disproportionately male (84.1%), limiting generalizability to female populations. The abstract does not detail specific load or volume equivalencies across the included trials.

Cited by