Sharma · Dentistry journal 2016 · narrative review · n=?

iPS Cells-The Triumphs and Tribulations.

Cited 24 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review without systematic methodology or primary human clinical data.

PubMed 29563461 · doi:10.3390/dj4020019 · record verified 2026-08-28

What was done

This narrative review summarizes the history of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) development, their biological properties (pluripotency and self-renewal), their applications in disease modeling, drug discovery, and regenerative cellular therapies, and the translational challenges facing their use in regenerative dentistry.

What was found

The abstract reports no numerical data. It qualitatively notes that while patient-derived iPSCs reduce immune rejection risks for regenerative medicine, generation of these cells remains slow, inefficient, technically difficult, and unsafe for human clinical applications.

Why it matters

It outlines the potential role of patient-specific stem cell technology in regenerative dentistry while emphasizing major biological and safety hurdles that prevent current clinical use.

Limits

As a non-systematic narrative review, the paper provides no original empirical measurements, clinical data, or quantitative synthesis. Specific dental protocols and outcomes are not detailed in the abstract.

Cited by