Faubion · Menopause (New York, N.Y.) 2018 · Expert consensus statement · n=16

Management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause in women with or at high risk for breast cancer: consensus recommendations from The North American Menopause Society and The International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health.

Cited 237 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Expert consensus panel using a modified Delphi method without new primary data

PubMed 29762200 · doi:10.1097/GME.0000000000001121 · record verified 2026-08-29

What was done

The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) and the International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health (ISSWSH) convened a 16-member multidisciplinary expert panel. Panelists reviewed the literature in their respective areas and utilized a modified Delphi process—involving presentations, debate, and iterative discussion—to construct a point-of-care clinical management algorithm for genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) in women with or at high risk for breast cancer (including estrogen-receptor positive, triple-negative, and metastatic subgroups).

What was found

The abstract reports no empirical numbers or quantitative effect sizes. It reports that GSM is common and often untreated in breast cancer survivors. The panel determined that GSM management must be individualized, with nonhormonal therapies serving as first-line treatment. Local hormone therapies may be considered for women who fail nonhormone interventions following a discussion of risks and benefits in consultation with their oncologist.

Why it matters

This statement provides practical clinical guidance for treating debilitating GSM symptoms in breast cancer survivors while navigating the oncologic risks and substantial evidence gaps surrounding vaginal hormone therapy.

Limits

The recommendations represent expert consensus based on modified Delphi methodology rather than a systematic review or randomized trial, providing no new patient data. The abstract explicitly highlights substantial gaps in the evidence regarding the safety of vaginal hormone therapies in this population.

Cited by