Fransquet · Clinical epigenetics 2019 · systematic review and meta-analysis · n=23 studies (41,607 participants)

The epigenetic clock as a predictor of disease and mortality risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies

PubMed 30975202 · doi:10.1186/s13148-019-0656-7 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines across MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and PsychINFO. Investigators included studies evaluating peripherally measured DNA methylation age acceleration as a predictor of longevity, age-related diseases (cancer, cardiovascular disease, and dementia), or all-cause mortality. Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists were used to evaluate bias. Two meta-analyses (one per epigenetic clock) evaluated all-cause mortality risk.

What was found

Twenty-three articles encompassing 41,607 participants met inclusion criteria (4 on longevity, 11 on age-related disease, and 11 on mortality). Meta-analyses found that each 5-year increase in DNA methylation age was associated with an 8% to 15% increased risk of all-cause mortality. Associations between increased epigenetic age and specific age-related diseases or longevity were inconsistent or inconclusive, with no specific effect sizes reported in the abstract.

Why it matters

This synthesis demonstrates that DNA methylation age acceleration predicts all-cause mortality across large human cohorts, although its diagnostic or prognostic utility for specific chronic diseases remains unconfirmed.

Limits

The abstract notes high heterogeneity in study designs and outcome measures, a small number of studies for disease-specific endpoints, and potential positive publication bias for mortality findings. Exact numerical risk estimates, clock types, and confidence intervals were not reported in the abstract.

Cited by