Temple · Diabetes care 2019 · cross-sectional study · n=230

Association of Habitual Daily Physical Activity With Glucose Tolerance and β-Cell Function in Adults With Impaired Glucose Tolerance or Recently Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes From the Restoring Insulin Secretion (RISE) Study.

Cited 16 times in the scientific literature.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Cross-sectional observational analysis of baseline cohort/trial data

PubMed 31177181 · doi:10.2337/dc19-0538 · record verified 2026-08-27

What was done

Researchers analyzed baseline cross-sectional data from 230 adults (mean age 54.5 ± 8.5 years; mean BMI 35 ± 5.5 kg/m²; 42.6% women) with impaired glucose tolerance or drug-naive, recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes participating in the Restoring Insulin Secretion (RISE) Study. Habitual physical activity was measured using wrist accelerometers worn for 7 consecutive days to determine total physical activity counts (TAC). Participants underwent a 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and a hyperglycemic clamp to assess glucose tolerance (fasting glucose, 2-hour glucose, glucose incremental area under the curve [G-iAUC]), insulin sensitivity (clamp-derived M/I ratio), and β-cell responses (acute C-peptide response, steady-state C-peptide, maximal β-cell response, and OGTT C-peptide index).

What was found

The daily mean TAC was 233,460 counts. After adjustment for confounders, higher TAC was associated with higher clamp-derived insulin sensitivity (M/I). However, TAC showed no association with fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour glucose, or G-iAUC. After adjusting for insulin sensitivity (M/I), higher TAC was not associated with any measures of β-cell response. Numerical effect estimates, confidence intervals, and p-values were not provided in the abstract.

Why it matters

These findings indicate that habitual physical activity in early dysglycemia is linked to metabolic health primarily via improved peripheral insulin sensitivity rather than direct enhancements in β-cell secretory capacity.

Limits

The study is cross-sectional, preventing causal inference. The abstract reports no numerical effect sizes or confidence intervals for the observed associations. Results apply specifically to adults with prediabetes or drug-naive, recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes and may not generalize to treated or advanced populations.

Cited by