Brar · Annals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism 2019 · narrative review · n=?

Update on the current modalities used to screen high risk youth for prediabetes and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Cited 17 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review of diagnostic screening modalities without systematic search criteria or meta-analysis.

PubMed 31261470 · doi:10.6065/apem.2019.24.2.71 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

Review of the diagnostic performance, advantages, and limitations of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and 2-hour plasma glucose during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for screening high-risk youth for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

What was found

Prevalence rates for T2DM varied from 0.53% in Chinese youth to 18.3% in high-risk overweight or obese Korean youth. Abnormal FPG (>100 to <126 mg/dL) was present in 15% of Korean youth versus 8.7% of Chinese youth. Prediabetes prevalence based on HbA1c (5.7%-6.4%) was 1.49% in Chinese youth versus 21% in Emirati youth. The overall coefficient of agreement (k) between screening tests for T2DM was fair at 0.45-0.5 across all youth, but agreement between HbA1c and FPG was weak (k=0.18 in German youth vs k=0.396 in Korean youth). OGTT and HbA1c did not consistently detect T2DM in the same individuals, with HbA1c noted as potentially non-ideal for Hispanic and African American youth.

Why it matters

Single-modality screening with HbA1c misses dysglycemia in certain pediatric populations due to racial, ethnic, and physiological variation. Combining or sequencing FPG, OGTT, and HbA1c is needed to fully capture pediatric glucose dysregulation.

Limits

This is a narrative review with no reported systematic search methodology, risk of bias assessment, or total participant sample size. Findings are drawn from disparate study populations with varying baseline risk profiles rather than a standardized comparative cohort.

Cited by